8 Content Frameworks and Approaches that Make Messy Ideas Look Intentional

When your content doesn’t land, it’s often not because of the topic. It’s the structure.

Structure determines how a piece of writing unfolds—what gets revealed first, how tension builds, and where the insight lands. It turns scattered ideas into form. A strong content framework makes your writing tighter, more focused, and easier to follow—without your target audience needing to reread to keep up.

If you work in content marketing, UX, or digital strategy, the right structure supports your ideas and business objectives, drives audience engagement, and creates space for valuable insights to land where they’ll stick.

This article outlines eight frameworks used by journalists, strategists, UX writers, and essayists. Each one addresses a different kind of structural problem and solves a different type of structural challenge—whether you're drafting blog posts, shaping social media content, or building out a full content marketing strategy. 

Let’s get started!

TL;DR

1. Inverted Pyramid: Start with the outcome. Deliver value immediately, then zoom out.
2. The Tramezzino Approach: Say what’s inside up front
3. Narrative Design: Structure content like a story
4. Thesis–Antithesis–Synthesis: Present an idea, challenge it, then resolve the tension
5. The Loop & Callback: Begin with a hook. End by returning to it.
6. The Pyramid of Curiosity: Tease, reveal, deliver
7. The Constellation Method: Map stand-alone insights around a central theme
8. The Breadcrumb Structure: Every section pulls the reader forward

1. Inverted Pyramid

• Origin: 19th-century journalism
• Core idea: Start with the most important info, then taper off into supporting detail
• Best for: News, SEO, announcements 

The inverted pyramid was built for urgency. In the telegraph era, journalists had to front-load essential facts in case transmission was cut off. The result: a structure that opens with the outcome, not the setup.

It’s a structure that prioritizes clarity under pressure. First, the core fact. Second, the supporting facts. Then, everything else.

It still works—especially in environments where readers scan more than they read. The structure forces prioritization. It demands the writer to decide what matters most and put it at the top.

It’s a smart fix when a piece starts slow, hides its value under several paragraphs of setup, or loses the reader before they understand the desired outcome. If your content creation relies on clarity under pressure, start here.

Here are some examples of how to use the inverted pyramid across different content types:

💡 Note: The inverted pyramid framework—and some other writing frameworks in this list—closely resembles the BLUF (bottom line up front) method of writing, often used in newsrooms and business contexts, including content marketing.

2. The Tramezzino Approach

• Origin: Robin Good
• Core idea: Open strong. Give the reader the “ingredients” of your piece up front, like unwrapping a sandwich.
• Best for: Web content, newsletters, fast-scan articles

The Tramezzino Approach is a content structure introduced by Robin Good in 2008. It borrows its name from the tramezzino—a soft, triangular Italian sandwich that shows its contents at a glance.

“Say outright what’s inside your tramezzino without wasting too much time getting to it.” – Robin Good

It’s a modern evolution of the inverted pyramid, designed for digital reading habits. While the inverted pyramid opens with facts—who, what, when—the Tramezzino opens with intent. The first line gives away the point. The rest supports it.

Robin Good even says in his own words:

“The sandwich approach is nothing else but my own personalized way of introducing inside my editorial publishing policies a concept that is very well known inside traditional journalism circles: the inverted pyramid.”

Here’s how it works in practice:

• Traditional opening: “Every SaaS team struggles with onboarding at some point. Confusing flows and unclear copy can push users away before they even begin.”
• Tramezzino version: “Most onboarding flows fail because they make users think.”

The second version tells you what the piece is about in one sentence. The rest expands from there.

3. Narrative Design

• Origin: Narrative theory, adapted from the work of Vladimir Propp (morphology of folktales), Joseph Campbell (The Hero’s Journey), and later adapted by screenwriters like Dan Harmon (Story Circle) and game designers like Jesse Schell
• Core idea: Structure writing like a story—characters, conflict, resolution
• Best for: Case studies, brand stories, LinkedIn personal essays

Narrative Design applies the logic of storytelling to nonfiction writing. It borrows from narrative theory—Propp’s character functions, Campbell’s hero’s journey, Harmon’s story circle—and adapts that structure to shape how ideas unfold.

In content, Narrative Design creates forward motion. It gives the reader a reason to stay with the piece through story logic: tension, change, resolution. 

The structure is simple:

Setup → Tension → Transformation → Insight

It starts with a situation or status quo. Then, it introduces a shift—something that disrupts, challenges, or complicates. From there, it shows change, movement, or resolution. And finally, it lands on an insight: what was learned, what changed, what matters now.

Here’s an example of how we use the narrative design in our case studies: 

Curious how it played out? Read the full case study here.

4. Thesis–Antithesis–Synthesis (Dialectical Framework)

• Origin: Johann Gottlieb Fichte (popularized via Hegel)
• Core idea: Present a concept, challenge it, and then resolve the tension
• Best for: Essays, philosophical pieces, thought leadership

I love this image from sketchplanations. It captures the core idea simply: take a position, challenge it, and then resolve the tension. That’s the dialectical method, adapted for writing.

The structure is old, rooted in Hegelian and Marxist philosophy. In writing, the Thesis–Antithesis–Synthesis framework helps structure pieces that need to hold two opposing ideas and arrive at something clearer, sharper, or more useful.

It works like this:

• Thesis: Start with a position, belief, or status quo
• Antithesis: Introduce its opposite—an objection, flaw, or counter-example
• Synthesis: Reconcile or resolve the two into a refined insight

This model is especially effective for content that tackles common assumptions, explores nuance, or leads the reader through a shift in perspective. You’re not just saying, “this is true”—you’re showing why it’s not that simple and what comes next.

Here’s an example of how we used this framework in our article about the dslx rebranding journey:

5. The Loop & Callback

• Origin: Oral storytelling + screenwriting (Dan Harmon, TED, etc.)
• Core idea: Start with an image/scene, loop through the main content, and return to that starting point for closure
• Best for: Speeches, personal essays, carousels, founder notes

The concept is simple: start with something specific, leave it unresolved, build your case, and then return to it at the end.

The loop creates familiarity. The callback creates closure. Together, they create rhythm and help the reader (or listener) feel that something has landed.

It usually opens with a moment, image, or phrase—something concrete enough to lodge in memory. The body of the piece expands the idea, often moving away from that starting point. But at the end, the original moment returns—with new meaning. 

It’s also incredibly effective in short-form writing, like on LinkedIn. Here’s an example of how Ray Berry, Founder & CEO at dslx does it: 

6. The Pyramid of Curiosity

• Origin: Copywriting + layered learning
• Core idea: Each line opens with a small question that pulls you down the page
• Best for: Newsletters, editorial blogs, Twitter/X threads

Some frameworks lead with answers. This one builds toward them.

The Pyramid of Curiosity is a content marketing framework designed to generate engagement by sequencing value, not front-loading it. It works by creating tension and then releasing it. You don’t start with the full story. You build a structure that rewards attention as it climbs.

It’s the inverse of the inverted pyramid. Instead of satisfying search intent immediately, it delays resolution to pull your audience deeper into the content. It’s the shape behind product pages that convert, landing pages that get read, and social media posts that make people stop scrolling.

The structure is simple:

• Tease: Present a sharp tension or bold outcome. Raise a question your audience already cares about.
• Reveal: Offer partial clarity. Enough to validate the reader’s interest, but not enough to let go.
• Deliver: Resolve the tension. Land the insight, outcome, or idea. This is where high-quality content meets a clear objective.

This is how we use the Pyramid of Curiosity in our dslx newsletter:

7. The Constellation Method

• Origin: Literary essays (Didion, Solnit)
• Core idea: Non-linear structure where different sections orbit a central theme
• Best for: Reflective writing, explorative thought pieces

Some pieces don’t move forward. They expand outward.

The Constellation Method is a content strategy structure that trades sequence for shape. It’s not a single storyline or funnel. It’s a set of points—complete on their own, but more powerful in proximity.

This approach has roots in literary essayists like Didion and Solnit. In content marketing, it shows up in social media posts, carousel threads, curated blog content, and pillar pages. You’re not driving to a specific CTA. You’re showing the edges of a system. Each idea targets a different layer of the topic. The whole thing becomes navigable.

It works when:

• You’re mapping a complex theme across multiple content formats
• You want to address several specific pain points without flattening them
• You’re publishing content for readers who value perspective over prescription

Here’s an example of how the same content topic can be approached linearly or constellation-style:

‍8. The Breadcrumb Structure

• Origin: Copywriting + UX patterns
• Core idea: Each paragraph or section leaves a ‘cliffhanger’ or hint of what’s next
• Best for: Serialized content, lead nurturing emails

The Breadcrumb Structure is built for momentum. Every line earns the next. Every section ends with a small nudge forward—just enough friction to keep the reader moving.

This approach borrows from UX design and classic copywriting. Think of it as tension applied to structure: each paragraph closes a thought, but opens a question. Like breadcrumbs dropped along a trail, the reader keeps following because each step promises something ahead.

It works well in formats where you can’t afford to lose people halfway through. Where your content creation strategy needs to support longer arcs: sales funnels, product education, email marketing, or even social media threads that layer meaning over time.

Here’s what it looks like in UX:

Here’s how we use the Breadcrumb Structure in practice—this one’s from a UX content project we did for one of our clients:

Write With Form, Not Function

Phew 😮‍💨

If you’re still with me, you’ve just read through eight different content frameworks—from pyramids and sandwiches to constellations and callbacks.

What they all have in common? Structure that serves the reader. Not function. Not formatting. But form—the kind that shapes experience.

Remember, these frameworks are starting points. Tools you can reach for when you're staring at a blank doc and thinking: “Okay, but how do I start this?”

And if you’re someone who builds content daily—whether it’s blog posts, landing pages, email campaigns, or carousels—knowing which structure to reach for is half the job. The rest? Voice, insight, timing. But it starts here.

If you liked this, you’ll love what we’re building inside the dslx Academy 😍

The dslx Academy is where we’re unpacking the how and the why of content strategy. Sign up to get first dibs

See you there! 👋